My first book, Sex Isn't Real: The Invention of an Incoherent Binary (Duke University Press, 2026) is about how sex functioned as a scientifically-backed method of sorting bodies in the 19th and 20th centuries because it could contain multitudes. Sex could be defined by all kinds of things—external anatomy, internal anatomy, hormones, metabolic rate, chromosomes, behavior—depending on the research question or social argument at hand, and often worked with several conflicting definitions simultaneously. A key part of those conflicting yet coexisting models of those sex was the fact that sex operated as both a self-evident binary of male and female and a far more complex gradation on the cutting edge of scientific inquiry.
The book is fundamentally an assertion that norms of binary sex took a lot of work to construct, and take a lot of work to maintain—essentially, it's a prehistory of cisness. While some bodies that weren't easily classified as male or female were occasionally cast out of those categories as pathological anomalies, the book focuses on how scientists and medical doctors brought all kinds of exceptions back into normative sex categories without damage to the system of sex itself. It follows a sprawling cast of mostly American researchers through zoology, eugenics, gynecology, statistical studies of sex, and transgender medicine as they self-fashioned their expertise, created enmeshed fields of sex science and race science, and made science the way to know sex.
I am now at work on two additional projects. One, tentatively titled The Survival of Man: Nuclear Planning and the Future of Sex, examines scientific imaginings of post-nuclear disaster reproduction and repopulation in the Cold War United States. I'll be conducting archival research for this project as the 2025-26 Fedwa Malti-Douglas Short-Term Research Fellow at the American Philosophical Society. The other is (again very provisionally) titled Sunsets are Nonlinear: Lesbian and Trans Feminisms in the Roots of STS; with the work of Susan Leigh Star as its point of departure, this project offers an alternative genealogy of science studies critiques of classification via the category-busting politics of the queer 1970s-90s.
Here are a few things I've written:
"The History of Sex Research: Is 'Sex' a Useful Category?" Cell 187, no. 6 (2024).
“Denaturing Cisness, or, Toward Trans History as Method,” in Feminism Against Cisness, ed. Emma Heaney (Durham: Duke University Press, May 2024)
"Wrenching Torque: On Being Professionally Nonbinary," Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences 52, no. 3 (2022).
"Standards of Care: Uncertainty and Risk in Harry Benjamin's Transsexual Classifications," Transgender Studies Quarterly 8, no. 4 (2021). PDF access here.